Sutter’s been a busy guy this weekend. TSN is reporting another deal by the Flames’ GM, this one sending Jokinen and Prust to the Rangers for Chris Higgins and Ales Kotalik.
I think Sutter is sending out a message loud and clear today; that message being: “I’m cutting lose the deadweight”.
When Dion Phaneuf scored on a one-timer to put the Flames up 4-1 on the Oilers last night, I couldn’t help but wonder how many more times we would see Phaneuf celebrating as a Flame. Daryl Sutter didn’t keep me waiting long for the answer.
I won’t belabour the details of the trade, since you can get those from any of a variety of reputable (or not) news sources. I do have some thoughts of my own to add to the analysis, though.
This is a very simplified take on things, but take a look at the goals scored among the players traded in this deal. Phaneuf and Sjostrom total 11 goals, while the foursome on their way to Calgary have tallied 47 this season (point totals are 28 and 108, respectively). Obviously there are plenty more variables at play here, but one thing is obvious to me: this trade is meant to address Calgary’s scoring troubles. Matt Stajan’s 41 point immediately make him the Flames’ second-leading scorer, trailing only Jarome Iginla (by 10 points), and leading Rene Bourque by a single point. This leads me to agree with Pierre McGuire; on NBC this morning he called this trade a great short-term deal for the Flames, but good in the long-term for the Leafs. Obviously there’s the whole prospect thing at play where Aulie is concerned, but I suspect that McGuire is suggesting Phaneuf will pay dividends in Toronto as well. I’m not so sure…
Dion Phanuef strikes me as the type of player who is susceptible to distraction and pressure. If you’re a Maple Leaf, Toronto boasts distractions and pressure aplenty; I don’t think Toronto is the change of scenery that this guy needs. My prediction is that he will be wearing a different team’s colours within three years. Much like Joe Thornton, I think Dion Phaneuf would benefit from the obscurity of playing in a non-traditional hockey market.
The Flames have been making use of pretty much their full cap space since the beginning of the salary cap era. How does this deal affect the cap situation? In short, it frees up 4.25 million dollars for next season. Between Sjostrom and Phaneuf, the Flames are moving $7.25 million, and in return are accepting $6.93 million in return; however, Stajan, Mayers, and White are all free agents after this year (White being RFA, currently making $850,000). This means that Hagman is the only player committed to beyond next season. Meanwhile, the Flames rid themselves of Phaneuf’s $6.5 million cap hit that extends to 2014. This certainly opens up more opportunities for what Sutter can do in the off-season (spoiler: Bourque and Giordano get their earned raises AND stay in Calgary).
The writing has been on the wall for a while where Phaneuf is concerned. Despite the repeated denials by Sutter and Phaneuf, you got the feeling that something was going to go down. By trading for several players like this as opposed to trying to land a one-for-one marquee deal or a high cost rental (ie. Kovalchuk), Sutter is spreading out the risk at the cost of potential impact. This deal should immediately give the Flames some improved scoring depth, dipping into an area where they already have considerable talent in order to pay for it. In the long-term it allows them to unload a contract that is starting to look overpriced. Ultimately, this trade gets my approval for that reason.
Think Sutter’s going to call it quits after this deal? I doubt it. I tend to agree with Kent Wilson over on Matchsticks and Gasoline about Martin Biron being an attractive target as a back-up for Kipper. I’ve heard some positive sentiment towards Curtis McElhinney lately, but consider this quote from Kent’s article:
Curtis McElhinney is currently 71st in the league in terms of ES SV%. That’s the single worst 5on5 save rate of any goalie that has appeared in 10 games this year.
It would make sense to add a little insurance if this team wants to be a serious contender.
Hey, did you hear we won a game last night? And we scored six goals. It was against the Oilers, so take it for what it’s worth, but still, it’s nice to break out of that rut. On the topic of that game, I think Sheldon Souray would be well advised to stay away from Jarome Iginla; nothing good comes of that (so far this season: concussion and fractured hand). Come to think of it, he should maybe try to avoid fighting altogether (see: fight with Byron Ritchie where he suffered a separated shoulder).
I imagine we’ll get a look at the new faces tomorrow night against the Flyers. Back in the win column and time to get serious.
Tags: maple leafs, phaneuf, sjostrom, toronto, Trade
OVERALL: C
Yes, they have more wins than losses… HOWEVER, they have grossly underachieved thus far and should NOT be out of the playoff race at any point this season, but here we are… They rank 14th out of 30 teams and are considered to be the Boston Bruins of the West…
A+/-
Mikka Kiprusoff: 23-15-6 with a 2.25 GAA and .925 Save Percentage, he’s back to his old numbers and most of this if not all is about him as a goalie, having to stand on his head to keep his team in the game and not getting any help from his defence. Kipper has revived himself to the standards he set back in ‘04-’06
B+/-
Rene Bourque: No doubt he’ll score 20 goals and is solid on the second line…. His streaky nature and tendency to stick handle too much keeps him from reaching the A’s in this report card.
Daymond Langkow: Steady vet presence and leadership are seen in his ability to make others better and to find choice scoring chances for himself. Can play with anyone and is versatile but not spectacular in his play.
Curtis Glencross: Has been what he advertises, a hard nose player who likes to grind and get in the corners. Needs to stay out of the penalty box at key times and to continue to check hard and often.
Curtis McElhinney: Yes, I have called on him to be moved in the past but management stuck by him for good reason. He is a steady backup who keeps his team in the game and gives them a shot. Not spectacular but Not a liability anymore, he just doesn’t have the big game experience like Kipper to make it to the A-list.
Mark Giordano: Stepped up his offensive game in a big way, pinches when he needs to and has a great little fake at the point to lure the D away and he’ll sneak in along the boards for an offensive scoring chance. Big hits and has matured very nicely into a top Flames D-man… Averaging 20 mins of Ice Time per game.
Jay Bouwmeester: Logs an average of 26 mins of ice time per game and is a steady defensive presence for the Flames. Although he seems a bit mis-used in this system, and seems lost in the system, he’s the team plus/minus leader at +10 and reminds me of a younger Tomas Kaberle, a steady puck moving defenceman who understands stick work and positioning… his lapses and giveaways keep him off the A-List.
Brent Sutter and Staff: Above average in their performance this far. Initiating a new system is never easy for a coach but Brent Sutter seems diligent and persevering in his attempt to make this team perform to it’s capability. Jamie “Noodles” McLennan I think is the reason Kipper is playing the way he is… he was a voice of reason and seemed like a strong mentor to Kippers mental game when McLennan backed him up. Lowry and McGill are well seasoned well respected and well educated men of Hockey and they’ve really put their noses to the grindstone assisting Brent Sutter. The only thing that’s going against Brent Sutter is that he is not Darryl Sutter. I haven’t seen anyone bring out the best in Calgary players like Darryl Sutter and he was the reason guys like Phaneuf and Iginla are stars.
C+/-
Jarome Iginla: Captain Iggy is struggling this year (this based upon standards that he has established) and seems at a loss in what to do to get going again. Team leader in Goals and Points but only has 5PPG, which is behind players such as… Stephen Weiss FLA, Brooks Laich WAS, and Kristian Husselius CBJ. Simple fact is that Iggy seems ordinary this year and we NEED him to be consistently EXTRAordinary. Enough Said.
Robyn Regehr: Was supposed to be an anchor for the defence but seems like he’s struggling to get a grasp on the Brent Sutter system of defence. Another reason he is in this section on the report card is that he’s not being the leader that the Flames need him to be. Soft spoken players who have the admiration and respect like Robyn Regehr need to speak up… he gives nice analysis in his interviews but if he got into people’s faces a lot more, I have no doubt they’d listen.
Olli Jokinen: #21 is going to cost the Flames their 1st Round Draft choice this coming June and all we got was a player who was supposed to be playing like he did in 2006-2008 in which he averaged 80+ pts. but instead would struggle to produce 50pts this season. He has the potential to break out but seems like he’s lost an edge or some confidence in his play, whatever the case is, he’s playing average and is graded as such.
Nigel Dawes: No one would’ve expected Dawes to score 10 goals all year but here he is just past he mid-point with 10 goals. A nice pickup by the Flames but his streaky-ness in his scoring and his seemingly ability to only connect with Langkow and Bourque limit his potential on this team.
Eric Nystrom: He has a great work ethic and is a perfect fit for this system, however, seems as though he has plateaued in his play. He grinds, he fights, he pesky and a hard nosed player but with a -4 rating, he’s either a liability defensively or is on a line with Dion Phaneuf one too many times.
Dustin Boyd: His game is improving… I suppose expectations were high on my part seeing him as part of the Sidney Crosby lead Canadian World Junior team under Brent Sutter but really, his game is about cycling the puck, digging in the corners and has the hands to be an average goal scorer in this league.
Brandon Prust: Steady. A guy who wants to be a spark plug, energy player and one who isn’t afraid to drop the gloves to make a statement to the crowd and his team. He’s aggressive and tough and the only reason he’s not higher on this report card is his lack of results on the score sheet.
Brian McGrattan: Does what he was signed to do. Fight and Enforce. He does it well and makes the passing grade. (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nj7gb9AKE_w)
Jamie Lundmark: Great call-up and has a great ice vision but again, his -5 rating puts him at the bottom of the Flame barrell and squeaks by for an average report.
Adam Pardy: His game has improved immensely but not to the point where he makes it higher than a C grade. He was drafted in the same year as Dion but his progress was a lot slower. Seems to be getting the hang of it as a D man on this team and is a steady contributor to the Flames success. Always room for improvement and in this system can only get better.
D+/-
David Moss: You would think that he has it made when he uses his 6-3 frame to screen goalies while having guys like Phaneuf, Bouwmeester, Giordano, Jokinen, Iginla…etc. to feed him shots to deflect or passes to tip and bang home but he really needs to get going and I hope that he gets time on a line with Langkow so he has a consistent guy to feed him the puck. The other reason for a D is his health. We need him to go deep in the playoffs and be the Dave Andreychuk type player who can score 30 goals without thinking.
Craig Conroy: Yes, he does the little things we may not see on a nightly basis and Yes, he’s a great locker room guy and YES, I’d rather have him than Theo Fleury but age shouldn’t be a factor because he can still skate well and has the Hockey IQ that many players can only pray for. Once he steps up his game even a notch or two, the points will come and he’ll have even more credibility in the locker room.
Cory Sarich: He was a rock for the Stanley Cup winning Lightning in 2004 and has brought that swagger with him to Calgary but injuries have cost him a lot. We ’sore’ly missed him in the playoffs last spring against Chicago and the injuries are the only thing keeping him from being a rock on defence for the Flames. He has great rink vision and seems timid to land the big body check to turn a game around, like he did against the Sharks and Patrick Marleau a couple of years back… http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dIZdg8Smm78
F
Dion Phaneuf: He could be labelled as a scapegoat or a whipping boy but nothing in his play this year suggests that he has taken his game to the next level and being in his early 20’s, his stats shouldn’t be going down… Let’s not blame Elisha because as a sign read in the Dome, “Calgary LOVES sloppy seconds”! My observations from the games I’ve attended and watched is that he is too casual in his play. Moving the puck, chasing the puck, carrying the puck…etc. His Laissez-Faire attitude is driving me nuts and he’s gotten away from the game that made him who he is… Seems like now, he’s looking for the big hit and chasing a big hit instead of letting that big hit come to him.
Always a Pleasure!
Naoto
I shouldn’t be surprised at this after reading Theo’s book, but this recent blog post of his isn’t very classy: http://www.theofleury14.com/about/blog/235/index (via Matchsticks and Gasoline)
Update: Looks like Theo has pulled his blog post down. Lucky for us, Matchsticks and Gasoline still has a copy of it, so you can read it there.
My focus of this blog is the Flames but I had the opportunity to attend yesterdays game as a fan of the opposite team. I was born and raised in Toronto, lived there until I moved to Calgary in 2004 and still bleed Blue and White (only when they play the Flames). I love the city of Calgary and the Flames are my adopted team and so with that said…
What an atmosphere… I was in the 2nd level behind the Flames Attack Zone (so I got to see Jonas Gustavsson twice) and the Dome was literally a mix of blue and red. I’m starting to really see the true nature of Flame fans and it was something else.
My thoughts on this game were what I expected. The Flames were playing a solid game and so were the Leafs except for their usual 3-5 minute lapse in play, which in the end, caused their demise. I believe that the Leafs can hang with the best of them but what separates them from Great Teams is that 3-5 minutes of play where they’re giving pucks away in their own end and leaving their D men to fend for themselves.
Nigel Dawes, Daymond Langkow, Craig Conroy, Jarome Iginla, Curtis Glencross, Dustin Boyd, Brandon Prust…etc. They all play a solid two way game where they help out the Defence with their stick work and in your face kind of play… what I noticed the Maple Leafs doing was standing around and waiting for an outlet that would never come… If I was to judge the Leafs on this one game, I wouldn’t be able to stomach Phil Kessel just wating for a ripe cherry pick on the opposite Blue Line, Mr. Sutter would never stand for a player like that (Calling Kristian Husselius?!)
One thing the Flames will need to do is not rely on Kipper to stand on his head to keep them in the game. I like how they played in front of McElhinney the other night because he didn’t have to stand on his head, just make key saves when called upon…
Finally, being a Leaf fan in the Dome was awesome… maybe it was because we really can’t boast about alot but I found that the Fans weren’t obnoxious like Canuck or Oiler fans but a classy bunch of people who will always root for their team no matter what. We were loud but I was humbled as to how much louder the Flame fans were in the end!
Now back to reality of swimming the C of Red!
Always a Pleasure, Naoto
